Advocacy & Evidence-based Practice
04 Dec

Cord Blood Banking is one of the most heavily marketed services during pregnancy and birth. I will share with you some facts about Cord Blood banking which you need to keep in mind before making a decision.

  • Don’t be misled by pictures of celebrities endorsing cord blood banking. Do your own due diligence
  • Cord Blood banking is an emerging field and there is no absolute certainty that it will work
  • If your child does get sick later on in life from a genetic disorder, chances are high that its cord blood will also have the same genetic disorder, and so may not be able to use it. Yes, the stem cells may be used to treat the child’s sibling. This fact is not disclosed to parents, who end up thinking that it is their child who will most certainly use it.
  • Contrary to conventional marketing hype, cord blood is a very essential component of nutrients and immune giving substances that passes on to the baby immediately after birth. Evidence-based research tells us that the umbilical cord should not be clamped until it has stopped pulsated, when most of the cord blood has passed on to the baby. This is at odds with current practice followed by many cord blood companies and doctors of clamping umbilical cord and collecting the blood early enough, thus depriving the baby of important nutrients.
  • Cochrane Review has published a study (Reference #3) which says delayed cord clamping (even by 30 to 120 seconds after birth) improves premature babies’ health, with less need for transfusion of blood.
  • Early cord blood clamping can deprive the baby of upto 40% of its total blood volume, that will take nearly 6 months to regenerate.
  • Even if you allow your baby’s cord blood to be stored, there is no guarantee that the company will keep the sample in a sterile and safe manner, that will keep the integrity of the sample in tact.
  • Private storage of cord blood is not supported in many countries, and is illegal in Italy and France.
  • American Academy of Pediatrics as well as UK’s Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend that unless your family does has a history of genetic disorders, you do not resort to private cord blood storage.
  • It is also a fact that in many hospitals early clamping of the umbilical cord is a routine practice. The hospital then sells the placenta and the cord blood to the highest bidder.
  • You as parents should be the ones to decide for yourselves and for your baby’s well being if early clamping of the cord for extracting cord blood is a good idea.
  • As we always tell our mothers and dads, it is a very personal decision, but one which should be taken after doing due diligence. You owe it to your unborn baby.

References:

1. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/13/AR2009041301860.html

2. http://kidshealth.org/parent/_cancer_center/treatment/cord_blood.html#

3. http://www2.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab003248.html

4. http://midwifeinfo.com/articles/cord-clamping–please-wait

  • OrganicBabyUniversity

    Can yo \u post the reference link for the selling of the blood and placenta to the highest bidder? I have never heard of this and find this extremely disturbing!

  • Nita

    Hi ! I work for Americord Registry, a cord blood bank. Find out how you
    can save up to ten times more stem cells as compared to cord blood
    alone. See www.cordadvantage.com

  • Dr_Vijaya

    Thank you all for writing in. I can understand why cord blood banking companies are so aggressive in pushing their product/service – the market opportunity is huge and everyone wants a piece of the pie. Since there will always be two sides to this debate, I thought I would write some more on what are the current lines of thought regarding not only cord blood banking, but also delayed cord clamping which is inextricably linked to this topic.

    Both the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG) feel that the families may be vulnerable to emotional marketing at the time of birth of their child. According to RCOG, advertising leaflets regarding cord blood banking are distributed to antenatal clinics, obstetric practices, in women’s magazines and on the World Wide Web. Wordings such as “stem cells can be collected only at the time of birth”; “unimaginable possibilities”; “like freezing a spare immune system”; “saving the key components for future medical use”; and “saving something that may conceivably save his or her life someday”, may not be completely above board from the perspective of "truth in advertising".

    So, lets’ demystify this cord blood debate a bit. What exactly is cord blood? Cord blood contains haemopoietic stem cells (HSC). These cells have greater proliferative and colony forming capacity than those obtained from bone marrow, and are more responsive to some growth factors. Also, because they are “naïve”, they seem to produce fewer complications than those associated with some aspects of other HSC transplantation. Currently, they are most frequently used in the treatment of leukemia. In the future, cord blood might be a useful source of stem cells, rather than hemopoietic precursors. Reports suggest that not only mesenchymal and neural precursor cells present, but that some cord blood cells, in extremely low frequency may have the capacity to develop into many different lineages including cartilage, fat cells, hepatic and cardiac cells. RCOG in its 2nd Edition of its Scientific Advisory Committee Opinion Report on Cord Blood Banking, says unequivocally that research is still at an early stage, and “despite the amount of interest in the field, the therapeutic role for such cells remains speculative”.

    While neurologists, endocrinologists, and others are actively evaluating autologous cord blood to treat conditions such as brain injury, cerebral palsy, type 1 diabetes, and many other diseases, it is still a nascent field. The AAP, in its subject review and policy statement “Cord Blood Banking and its Potential for Future Transplants” says that no accurate estimates exist of the likelihood of children who will need their own stored cells. The range of estimates varies from 1:20,000 to 1:200,000. They say that based on the weight of the current evidence, it is difficult to recommend that parents store their child’s blood for future use. While both the AAP and the RCOG recommend more research and banking with strictly regulated public cord blood banks, they are both critical of private storage of cord blood as “biological insurance”. In India, the cord blood banking market is neither as strictly regulated, nor are there avenues for mass public banking at this time.

    What then are the known pros of cord blood banking? Private cord blood banking can be a good idea for families that have a child suffering from leukemia, lymphoma, other cancers, sickle cell disease and thallasemia. In this case, they can donate and store their baby’s cord blood for use in the sibling suffering from the disease. Such programs are available for free in the US such as the Children’s’ Hospital Oakland Research Institute Sibling Donor Cord Blood Program. Author and researcher Dr. Steven Joffe, who is a transplant physician at Boston’s Dana Farber Cancer Institute says that “in the absence of a family member known to be a candidate for stem cell transplant, the chances that privately stored cord blood will be used are quite small.” Similar opinions come through clearly in Dr. Sarah Buckley’s well-researched book “Gentle Birth, Gentle Mothering”. She states:

    • The likelihood of low-risk children needing their own stored cells has been estimated at 1:20,000
    • Cord blood donations are likely to be ineffective for the treatment of adults, because the numbers of stored stem cells are too small.
    • Cord blood may contain pre-leukemic changes and may risk relapse if used in the affected individual.
    • All other uses are speculative at this point.

    So, now to the other side of the debate – What are the benefits of delayed cord clamping, and why is this inextricably linked to this debate of cord blood banking? Cord blood banking companies require 60-120 ml of cord blood, which can only be made available only if the cord is clamped and cut within the first minute or two. In practice, we see that the cord continues to pulse for much longer – sometimes 5, sometimes 10 minutes, and the longest I have seen the cord pulse is an hour after the baby’s birth. Did this particular baby need the extra transfer of blood and nutrients? We will never know.

    Here is what is known about the benefits of delayed cord clamping:
    1) Studies done at UC Davis, UC Granada and others, show that delayed cord clamping results in:
    • Increased levels of iron ( 2 minute delay in cord clamping = 27-47 mg iron store transfer to the baby, which is equivalent to 1-2 months of an infant’s iron requirements)
    • Low risk of anemia
    • Less transfusions
    • Less incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage
    • Better protection from late onset sepsis
    • Baby can receive the complete retinue of clotting factors
    • Significant benefits demonstrated in premature babies, low birth weight babies and babies born to mothers with iron deficiency.
    2) In a recent study published in the Journal Pediatrics in 2010, Dr. Dong-Hyuk Park, Dr. Paul Sandberg, and Dr. Stephen Klasko, argue that delaying clamping of the umbilical cord for a slightly longer period of time allows for more umbilical cord blood volume to transfer to the infant, and with that critical period extended, many good physiological “gifts” are transferred through “nature’s first stem cell transplant” occurring at birth. Dr. Paul Sandberg also concludes that many common disorders of the newborn relating to immaturity of organ systems may receive benefits from delayed cord clamping. These may include respiratory distress, anemia, sepsis, and intraventricular hemorrhage. Midwives have always known this – it is like a backup security system until the infant’s organ system starts functioning fully well! Dr. Stephen Klasko, Sr. Vice President of University of San Fransisco (USF) Health Services, and Dean of the USF College of Medicine concludes the article by saying that there remains no consensus among scientists and clinicians on cord clamping and proper cord blood collection. He says “ The most important thing is to avoid losing transfer of valuable stem cells to the infant during and just after delivery”.
    3) The World Health Organization (WHO) in its publication “Care in normal birth: A Practical Guide” states “…. late clamping (or no clamping at all) is the physiological way of treating the cord, and early clamping is an intervention that needs justification”.
    4) Early cord clamping is s recent medical trend which has only been in practice since the 1940s, and that too only in a few countries. Julie Cook, mother and author of the book, “Unvaccinated, home schooled and TV-free” cites Erasmus Darwin and says that early cord clamping is not natural, normal or based on any evolutionary need. Umbilical cord blood is a baby’s life blood until birth. It contains magnificent cells such as red blood cells, stem cells and cancer-fighting T-cells. It comes from the placenta, since the umbilical cord is attached to it. The placenta really belongs to the baby; it is one of the baby’s organs while the baby is growing inside the mother. When the baby is born, and the umbilical cord is cut quickly, it is akin to amputating a live organ from a person. It is the same as submitting the newborn to severe hemorrhaging. If the umbilical cord is not cut, the placenta will expire naturally in an hour or so, after the blood has fully drained into the baby.

    Birthing methods have changed over the last century. In the early years mothers gave birth in “squatting” or other gravity-assisted positions which probably speeded up the stem cell transfer through cord blood. At Healthy Mother, we follow this as part of our care practice. However, in current hospitals, mothers are invariably made to lie down on their backs to give birth, and early cord clamping is the norm. While sometimes the cord is clamped early to facilitate medical resuscitation, in others, it is done quickly to facilitate cord blood banking. As the RCOG Bulletin points out, “ …. the collection procedures must be undertaken either during the third stage (while the placenta remains in utero) or shortly thereafter, a time when there is risk of postpartum hemorrhage and when mother and baby require maximum one-to-one care. This can prove to be a distraction to the hospital staff…. There is also pressure to ensure that a sufficiently large volume of cord blood is collected, since the likelihood of successful transplantation of cord blood HSC is related to the volume and cell dose collected.” In our practice at Healthy Mother, we see that staff from cord blood companies are not necessarily sufficiently trained to carry out the collection, and that they sometimes do not carry the requisite supplies. This lands up being an additional distraction in the immediate post birth minutes. Having said that, we are also about giving choice and should our customers choose to bank their baby’s blood after going through all the information, we sit down with the cord blood company representative to facilitate the process while preserving gentle birth of the baby.

    Dr. Vijaya Krishnan, DPT, MS, LCCE, Apprentice Midwife
    Director, Healthy Mother Natural Birthing Center, The Sanctum

    References:

    1. http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/r...
    2. http://aap.org/advocacy/releas...
    3. http://washingtonpost.com/wp-d...
    4. Gentle Birth, Gentle Mothering, Dr. Sarah Buckley (2005)
    5. http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/se...
    6. http://www.indianpediatrics.ne...
    7. http://www.sciencedaily.com/re...
    8. World Health Organization (1996). Care in Normal Birth: A Practical Guide

  • Americord Registry

     Hi ! I work for a cord blood
    bank and can give you the facts behind the over-promotion. See http://cordadvantage.com/cord-... to find 5 Straight Facts About Cord Blood ViaCord / ViaCell and Cord
    Blood Registry Won’t Tell You.

  • Marianne K.Nyberg midwife

    Choosing to delay cord clamping has many potential benefits for your baby's health.

    Increased Iron
    Allowing blood and nutrients from the placenta and umbilical cord to continue reaching your baby after birth could increase your baby's iron supply, reducing the occurrence of anemia. This poses considerable benefit in countries where anemia is a major problem. Increased iron stores in newborn infants is often a matter of life or death in these parts of the world.

    Backup Oxygen Supply
    Premature cord clamping may be linked to the occurrence or increased severity of respiratory distress syndrome. During labor and birth, the umbilical cord carries oxygen-rich blood to the lungs until breathing establishes. An intact cord acts as a backup oxygen supply as your baby adjusts to his or her new surroundings.

    Promotes Bonding
    The time immediately following the birth of your baby represents one of the most critical stages of bonding in his or her life. Leaving your baby's umbilical cord intact ensures that your baby stays attached to you, delays the hustle and bustle of measurements and tests, and promotes breastfeeding during this very important time in you and your baby's life.

    Stem Cells
    Scientists are just beginning to discover the amazing contents of umbilical cord blood, including stem cells and cancer-fighting properties. Instead of opting to “bank” your baby's cord blood, why not let your baby receive the full benefits of cord blood at the moment of birth, the way nature intended?

    Premature Infants
    Delayed cord clamping may have even greater benefits for premature infants. Although fewer studies have been done for babies born prematurely, delayed cord clamping has consistently shown reduction in the occurrence of anemia, bleeding in the brain, and the need for transfusions.

    If you encounter skepticism or unwillingness from your care provider to delay cord clamping, you can remind them gently that the medical literature fails to support reasoning behind premature cord clamping. You may also wish to present the potential benefits of delayed cord clamping to your provider for discussion

  • Dr_Vijaya

    Thank you, Marianne for writing in your thoughts.

    Vijaya

  • Madhurima

    Thank you, Dr. Subhadra Dravida for the information. Right interpretation comes from experience and knowledge in the field. Madhurima

  • Dr. Subhadra Dravida

    I totally disagree with the message given through this article and is misinterpreted from the published statements, while the evidence directs you to the different yet correct angle in Cord blood stem cell banking concept. Stem Cell banking is an advanced practice and is once in a life time opportunity for the expectant parents to cryopreserve their baby's stem cells for any specific present ailment or in future. Stem Cells harvested and cryopreserved from Umbilical blood are hematopoeitic in nature and have been excellent therapeutic tools in treating different kinds of cancers, whereas the mesenchymal stem cells harvested, expanded and cryopreserved from Cord tissue have the potential to address and manage spinal injuries, cardiac related ailments, diabetes, neurological disorders, osteoarthritis. These are the manifestations for which there is no cure for now. Stem Cell therapy is an extremely customized and personalized medicine and has been in practice in different countries in the world including India. Stem Cells isolated from different sources are not alike in their differentiation and proliferation capacity. The essence of Umbilical source is that the stem cells harvested have very high probability of matching for transplantation. The multicentric clinical trials conducted using umbilical stem cells have shown high success rates in graft acceptance and efficiency as well.
    Also, I would like convey this special message to all the expectant mothers that NO DOCTOR WOULD COMPROMISE WITH THE HEALTH OF THE BABY. Usually, the practice of Cord blood collection is after cessation of pulsation, appropriate clamping and Cord blood is collected by Gravity Bag Cord Blood Collection Method. The old practice of milking the blood from Cord causes polycytemia, which is not good for the baby. Nobody advocates and practises this and the expectant parents are requested not to get confused with misconceptions which have no scientific rationale. American Association of Physicians advocates Autologous Stem Cell therapy while some of the states in the USA are making the Umbilical cord blood collection a mandatory procedure in the Obstetrics practice.The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG) does not advocate against Cord Blood banking as there are more than 30 private cord blood banks in the UK alone.The Human Tissue Authority (HTA) and The European Union Tissues and Cells Directive (EUTCD) regulates Umbilical cord blood collection in the UK. RCOG commenting on insufficient evidence is not a regulated statement as the stem cell therapy is not like any other drug being marketed. Lack of documentation is not lack of evidence and this is an evolving field. Stem cell banking is not just for the families with history of genetic disorders as the umbilical source if profiled for HLA can very well be used for allogenic transplantations from the repository and this way the donors are helping the communities in finding matches. The process of Cord blood stem cell processing and banking involves certain specific conditions and procedures and so is the cost attributed. The donors pay for the processing procedure, transportation of the material in controlled fashion, cryopreservation protocol and for the consumption of liquid nitrogen in the process. The expectant parents definetely need to look for stable bank with scientific foundation.
    Subhadra Dravida CEO, Tran-Scell, Stem Cell Bank, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.

  • Ss

    People will go to a confusion state after going through Dr. Vijaya and Dr. Subhadra comments

  • Venkat_gsr

    Thanks a lot for this article.

  • Nina

    Thanks for this article! I couldn't believe how persistent (and yet not really well-informed) the reps from these cord blood companies were with me these past weeks!!

blog comments powered by Disqus