Advocacy & Evidence-based Practice
13 Feb

At Healthy Mother we advocate and practice Midwifery Model of Care which has many benefits over conventional “medical model”. This excerpt from review of the different models of care published by Cochrane Collaboration summarizes the conclusions of a study conducted for this purpose.

I am quoting below verbatim the summary of this review:

Midwife-led care confers benefits for pregnant women and their babies and is recommended.

In many parts of the world, midwives are the primary providers of care for childbearing women. Elsewhere it may be medical doctors or family physicians who have the main responsibility for care, or the responsibility may be shared. The underpinning philosophy of midwife-led care is normality, continuity of care and being cared for by a known and trusted midwife during labour.

There is an emphasis on the natural ability of women to experience birth with minimum intervention. Some models of midwife-led care provide a service through a team of midwives sharing a caseload, often called ’team’ midwifery. Another model is ’caseload midwifery’, where the aim is to offer greater continuity of caregiver throughout the episode of care. Caseload midwifery aims to ensure that the woman receives all her care from one midwife or her/his practice partner. Allmodels of midwife-led care are provided in a multi-disciplinary network of consultation and referral with other care providers. By contrast, medical-ledmodels of care are where an obstetrician or family physician is primarily responsible for care. In shared-care models, responsibility is shared between different healthcare professionals.

The review of midwife-led care covered midwives providing care antenatally, during labour and postnatally. This was compared with models of medical-led care and shared care, and identified 11 trials, involving 12,276 women.

Midwife-led care was associated with several benefits for mothers and babies, and had no identified adverse effects. The main benefits were a reduction in the use of regional analgesia, with fewer episiotomies or instrumental births. Midwife-led care also increased the woman’s chance of being cared for in labour by a midwife she had got to know, and the chance of feeling in control during labour, having a spontaneous vaginal birth and initiating breastfeeding. However, there was no difference in caesarean birth rates.

Women who were randomised to receive midwife-led care were less likely to lose their baby before 24 weeks’ gestation, although there were no differences in the risk of losing the baby after 24 weeks, or overall. In addition, babies of women who were randomised to receive midwife-led care were more likely to have a shorter length of hospital stay.

The review concluded that most women should be offered midwife-led models of care, although caution should be exercised in applying this advice to women with substantial medical or obstetric complications.

At The Healthy Mother Natural Birth Center, not only do we give low-risk women the ability to have full trial of labor and to birth naturally, we also believe mothers who have higher risk such as previous c-section, gestational diabetes, hypertension, flexed breech babies and other so-called issues also go through labor for as long they and their baby are able to under the 24-hour watchful care of our midwives. We have all emergency infrastructure available at a moment’s notice inhouse and so there is no need for mother to be transported to another facility should  an emergency occur. Therefore in the Healthy Mother Model of Care, even so called “high risk” mothers are empowered to try for natural birth.

About Cochrane Review:

Cochrane Reviews are systematic reviews of primary research in human health care and health policy, and are internationally recognized as the highest standard in evidence-based health care. (http://www.cochrane.org/cochrane-reviews)



Midwife-led care confers benefits for pregnant women and their babies and is recommended.
In many parts of the world, midwives are the primary providers of care for childbearing women. Elsewhere it may be medical doctors
or family physicians who have the main responsibility for care, or the responsibility may be shared. The underpinning philosophy
of midwife-led care is normality, continuity of care and being cared for by a known and trusted midwife during labour. There is an
emphasis on the natural ability of women to experience birth with minimum intervention. Some models of midwife-led care provide a
service through a team of midwives sharing a caseload, often called ’team’ midwifery. Another model is ’caseload midwifery’, where the
aim is to offer greater continuity of caregiver throughout the episode of care. Caseload midwifery aims to ensure that the woman receives
all her care from one midwife or her/his practice partner. Allmodels of midwife-led care are provided in a multi-disciplinary network of
consultation and referral with other care providers. By contrast, medical-ledmodels of care are where an obstetrician or family physician
is primarily responsible for care. In shared-care models, responsibility is shared between different healthcare professionals.
The review of midwife-led care covered midwives providing care antenatally, during labour and postnatally. This was compared with
models of medical-led care and shared care, and identified 11 trials, involving 12,276 women. Midwife-led care was associated with
several benefits for mothers and babies, and had no identified adverse effects.
The main benefits were a reduction in the use of regional analgesia, with fewer episiotomies or instrumental births. Midwife-led care
also increased the woman’s chance of being cared for in labour by a midwife she had got to know, and the chance of feeling in control
during labour, having a spontaneous vaginal birth and initiating breastfeeding. However, there was no difference in caesarean birth
rates.
Women who were randomised to receive midwife-led care were less likely to lose their baby before 24 weeks’ gestation, although there
were no differences in the risk of losing the baby after 24 weeks, or overall. In addition, babies of women who were randomised to
receive midwife-led care were more likely to have a shorter length of hospital stay.
The review concluded thatmost women should be offeredmidwife-ledmodels of care, although caution should be exercised in applying
this advice to women with substantial medical or obstetric complications.
B A C K G R O U N D
In many parts of the world, midwives are the primary providers of
care for childbearing women (Koblinsky 2006). There are, however,
considerable variations
  • There are so many midwifery advantages. I was not aware of this name but some day ago i came across some site and i have read about it and came to know how it can be advantageous for the birth of the child. With such a good service one can fully concentrate on their childbirth because one midwife is available for pregnant lady. Almost all the midwives are the experienced and certificated with good organisation. Midwives will be more open then the doctors so it will be more comfortable for the lady during the pregnancy.

blog comments powered by Disqus